Noam Chomsky pointing out that not so long ago, Sanders positions would not have been considered radical at all…
We all remember the people we met, campaigned, and often made friends with during the referendum campaign. However, were the people we met representative of the campaigners as a whole? Who were they all? If the Telegraph were to be believed then the whole campaign was just that one muscular guy in a kilt with his top off, as that seemed to be the only photo they used for the entire process.Was that really the case?
For the 126th episode of The Scottish Independence Podcast, I spoke with Dr Iain Black of Heriot-Watt University, who has conducted research with almost 1000 people who campaigned in the referendum to find out not just who the people were (age, gender, class, ethnicity), but also what people did and why they did it.
Which groups enjoyed the campaign more? Who did people think were more effective – local groups or the official Yes campaign?
The results of the study give some great insights into these questions and more.
Hope you enjoy it…
You can download here if you right click THIS LINK and “save as”
These podcasts are independently minded and independently funded, you can help to keep them going by making a donation.
The Trump V Sanders debate. Some funny moments, some not so funny, but it is worth the watch…
I have an article on the Hillsborough situation that I will put out in the next few days but, for the moment, I have to say that James O’Brien’s comments about Kelvin Mackenzie are a pretty good summation of one part of the story…
The tories don’t provide many services. In fact, they usually do their best to run them down so that they can then make the case to sell them off, repackaging it as an improvement.
One thing they are good at providing though, is motivation.
Look at the following and tell me you aren’t bursting to prove him/them wrong…
Advanced silliness on the Scotsman site yesterday, with no named journalist.
A row has broken out in the pro-independence camp over a giant SNP billboard campaign urging voters to use both of their votes to protect Nicola Sturgeon’s majority at Holyrood.
But Greens elections convenor Sarah Beattie-Smith said: “Greens agree a better Scotland is possible but voters know to achieve this we’re going to need a bolder Holyrood. That’s why the momentum on the regional vote in this election is with the Greens.”
SNP campaign chief John Swinney said; “We are the only party with the strength, the unity and the vision to take Scotland forward.”
This piece is basically “we’re bored and have nothing, so let’s have an SNP bad swing and see if something sticks”.
Unfortunately, as you can see from the comments under the ‘article’, some people obviously do.
What it boils down to is that the SNP want you to vote for them, and the Greens would prefer you vote Green. This is apparently a row and presumably means that an independent Scotland would fail or something.
We’ve all been hearing about the great sacrifices that Her Bettiness has made and all the difficulties she has had in guiding the country through such diverse times.
I for one would like to take those things into account, so here is your simple solution…
Let’s retire the position. If we do that, then she wouldn’t have to feel like she’d been sacked (“it’s not you we’re getting rid of, just the job”). We’d also spare her family and descendants the difficulty that their positions are bound to cause them.
After that they could easily get back to maiming or killing variously sized animals whilst heading up wildlife charities. Prince Philip, or indeed just Philip, could try and offend people in his spare time instead of being obligated to do it. They could wear nazi costumes or do nazi salutes, or indeed be fans of nazis, without having to do it in public.
A simple, sensible solution.