BETTER OR WORSE

26 10 2007

I changed the look of the thing.

Regular readers… better or worse?


Actions

Information

14 responses to “BETTER OR WORSE”

26 10 2007
Kim Ayres (08:43:39) :

I prefer it :)

26 10 2007
Christine McGeachin (09:36:24) :

Yes Michael, I think the new design is better…

26 10 2007
michaelgreenwell (09:44:05) :

thank you both. i feel somewhat vindicated.

26 10 2007
Mickey Z. (10:26:07) :

I agree, it’s better.

26 10 2007
V (10:58:29) :

Yes far better. Keep this layout.

26 10 2007
Justin (12:14:55) :

very nice

26 10 2007
Graeme (15:29:17) :

good. good. good. Keep it dude.

26 10 2007
flimsy sanity (21:09:15) :

I like it too - easier to read typeface and I like that it is narrower.

27 10 2007
Philip Challinor (14:17:22) :

Yes, I like it better too.

28 10 2007
Scruggs (06:31:31) :

Spare and quite nice. I like it.

28 10 2007
Gus Abraham (22:29:12) :

Good, great.

Good to meet!

29 10 2007
michaelgreenwell (11:14:38) :

cheers everyone. that seems fairly unanimous.

was good to meet gus!

29 10 2007
praguetwin (23:53:03) :

As if you needed it… I like it too.

31 10 2007
Colin Campbell (13:00:29) :

Nice job. I think it is pretty brave to fiddle with lay out. I think you can obsess on looks. I am a great believer in content and your content is very good. I may well read it if your scheme was purple and green.

Leave a comment

You can use these tags : <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>